Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Pogorelich

Here's the review from the New York Times of Pogorelich playing at the Metropolitan Museum a couple of weeks ago, which I finally got round to reading.

It's very upsetting. The photo is distressing enough - Kojak? - but I can well believe that Mr Tommasini is telling it how it was, since at the last concert I heard Pogorelich give in London, his playing fitted this description with appalling precision. It was a Rachmaninov piano concerto several years ago; I think it was supposed to be No.2, but what emerged was so distorted as to be almost unrecognisable. Yet a recital of his that I heard at London's Royal Festival Hall, probably the better part of 10 years back, was astonishing: so full of colour, nuance and brilliance that it was like watching a Kandinsky in a kaleidoscope.

I interviewed him in 1993, when I was the editor of Classical Piano magazine, as well as encountering him socially a couple of times. For the interview, I was asked to visit him at home in Surrey, where his spacious modern mansion included an exquisite wood-lined music room. He was charming, intelligent and well-informed, and as handsome as his photos (he was every piano student's pin-up). His motto was, more or less, 'no compromise': artistry had to be all or nothing. If I can find the article I'll post it in my permasite archive.

What has gone wrong? His wife, who was his former teacher from Moscow and to whom he seemed utterly devoted, died of cancer some time ago. It looks, from the outside, as if he has never quite found his feet again. Rumours circulated that he was ill and that he had given up performing; and the return journey does not appear promising. Perhaps it would be best if he did indeed bow out gracefully while and if he still can, leaving us with the memories of his artistry at its finest, untainted by this tragedy.

7 comments:

Lisa Hirsch said...

That is interesting to read, because his recording of Op. 111 is 20 or more years old and eccentrically slow, though not THAT slow. I think it's 33 minutes. (Ugorski takes around 41 and just barely gets away with it because the piano sound is so beautiful.)

Still, sounds like a bizarre concert all around.

Paul Stump said...

Oh dear, oh dear. I was never a massive fan but had lots of respect for IP. This sounds dreadful. The only time I ever heard someone really lose it was a Dmitri Alexeev performance of Rach 3 a decade and a half ago. That was just sloppy. This sounds cringeworthy. Best wishes to the lad.

J.HO said...

Although the reviews have been overwhelmingly negative, I've read that many people are flocking to his performances just to witness the spectacle in person. It's like a car crash--you just can't look away. Poor Mr. Pogorelich. Poor audience. I feel sorry for both sides.

Anonymous said...

I think that he should not retire. No way. He is a great artist and
a personal crisis or a new perspective (just like Godard's once had) does not mean chaos...
Extravagant, yes!
But a great artist indeed!

scy said...

Someone actually sent me a recording of this recital and I can tell you that it is not as bad as what the NY Times reviewer said. But I guess most reviewers like to criticise. It definitely sounded better than his Tokyo recital a few months ago.

aly said...

Scy, sorry, but where do You get such genereous friends?

Love, Aly

scy said...

Hi Aly, To tell you the truth...if you are genereous to others - others will be genereous to you. Not saying you are not genereous :) In fact I am late sending a recording to the people in NYC and Japan who sent me the recordings... I better do it soon!

scy