"...few recent compositions really move one - though many of them astonish. It seems as if the composers would wish to be classed with the flying man in his endeavours to 'go one better' than the last...much of the music of the period reminds one of the automobile and the airship. It is daring, clever, complex and utterly mechanical.
The question is - Should an imaginative Art follow such lines? Should it not rather come from the heart as well as the brain?
Of course, a fine technical equipment is a very desirable thing, and nothing of worth can be accomplished without it; but should 'What do you think of my cleverness?' be stamped so aggressively over nearly every score that we hear?
The lack of human passion in English music may be (personally I think is) merely transitory. It is being pushed aside only while the big technical Dreadnought is in its most engrossing stage of development. Soon the builders will have the time to love again - when the turmoil is hushed somewhat - to give the world a few tender and personal touches amidst the strife, which will 'make us feel again also'."
Jessica Duchen's Classical Music & Ballet Blog. Novelist/journalist JD writes for The Independent, London
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Who said this?
Who said this? Answer tomorrow. Suggestions welcome in the interim (no prize offered).
Labels:
Samuel Coleridge-Taylor
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Prince Charles?
Neville Cardus?
It's not Bax, but it's awfully similar to something he said along the lines of new music's fascination with technical concerns being unable to maks its inability to portray simple, basic things like young love or a summer's day.
Ralph Vaughn Williams?
G. B. Shaw?
Samuel Coleridge Taylor
It's Samuel Coleridge Taylor. (I don't know if my last one went through). Also I thought you handled the Hatto affair well, ie with appropriate sensitivity
Post a Comment