...there's a case of Critic v Conductor.
The New York Times has carried a story explaining that a music critic in Cleveland has lost his job for being, allegedly, excessively critical of the Cleveland Orchestra's conductor, Frankly Worse Than Most, oops, I mean Franz Welser-Most (FYI, the former is what certain musicians in London used to nickname him).
A lot of grey areas surrounded the appointing of FWM as principal conductor of the LPO, where he started back in 1990. Tennstedt departed in 1987 due to ill health, a replacement had not yet been named and it was then that the Tory government got a Lord to investigate things and recommend which of the London orchestras should be murdered. To qualify for a chance of survival, an appointment was needed and FWM was named PDQ. Not very many conductors would have been available at that kind of notice. Happily, the Hoffmann Report eventually told the government to get off and leave all our orchestras right where they were. Meanwhile FWM was in place, and if I remember rightly some of his performances were good and others weren't. Fairly normal, then.
BUT: the London press loathed him.
It was the critics, not the orchestra, that wrecked his career at the time in the British capital; he kept talking about this nightmare era in interviews for years. It is not entirely clear how it happened, but seems to go back to his first-ever press conference for the LPO, which most of the critics left with the impression that FWM was arrogant, abrupt, inexperienced and so forth. All of which may have mean that he was just bloody nervous. But what's certain is that the resident vipers developed a serious grudge which only got worse. The difference was, they didn't lose their jobs - whereas eventually the unfortunate youth, after enduring five and a half years of printed hell, packed his bags earlier than intended.
Perhaps what's happened to the critic Donald Rosenberg is a hazard of smaller-city-America cultural life; here in London, just one critic could never have been held responsible for the savaging of FWM. They were all at it like a pack of hyenas. It is easier to target one person operating in a cultural desert, like a gazelle that's been separated from its herd...
All of which does not necessarily mean that FWM is the world's greatest conductor.
4 comments:
Well, Rosenberg is obviously continuing to try to earn his keep, such as this recent review. But at Tom Service put it so well at his Guardian blog, "this sucks", regarding ousting a critic for his words, however harsh, about an institution. But the "Midwest" factor is true, since there's no musical institution of comparable prestige in Cleveland besides the Cleveland Orchestra, so having one critic on the beat is a miracle enough, and there's not a whole lot else to review that would necessarily travel beyond local confines. (And speaking of the Midwest, some musicians in at least one city have affection for him, as indicated at the end of this article.)
I'm no particular fan of FWM, as he strikes me a rather a generally straightforward and non-intrusive conductor, yet at the same time not having tremendous "personality" or "flair" in his interpretations, nebulous as those terms are. In other words, you'll get the music straight, without much pushing and pulling of tempo around, but sort of "plain vanilla", from what I've seen of him.
It's good to see a critic getting his comeuppance, this being so rare and these people can do so much harm, normally without fear of reprisal.When it comes to events one has been to, critics are of no use anyway, except that they may spoil something one has enjoyed.
While I'm not defending Rosenberg's particular attitudes, it alarms me to read that it's a good thing that he got his "comeuppance" simply for expressing his honest opinions, however harsh. I paraphrase Churchill, roughly: "the duty of a critic is to criticize". By that logic, anyone who criticizes any powerful organization or figure for its/his/her faults should be drummed out of her/his job simply for saying so. (I am especially thinking of the moral sociopaths in charge of the Executive branch in this country now and what they've done to critics; think Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson, for starters.) What happened to freedom of speech, and the right to one's opinion there?
It's not a 'comeuppance' if he is actually right.
Post a Comment