"When 5000 people pay to listen to Bach on a solo violin, there's hope for Western civilisation," says The Times. My colleague Ed Seckerson at the Indy says it was 6000 people, so the news is perhaps even better. Either way, bravo Nigel Kennedy. The markets are in turmoil, people have been looting in Tottenham, Enfield and Brixton, but over at the RAH, or in front of our own radios, we're listening to the Proms and feeling lucky to be alive.
Honest to goodness, guv, I really believe the world would be a better place if we could all spend more time making or listening to great music and less time on greed, envy, accumulation, materialism and...oh well. It's worth saying now and then, even if only one person takes it on board.
How anybody could have failed to take the lessons of the Simon Bolivar Symphony Orchestra on board with that Mahler 2 on Friday is beyond me (pictured left: the queue at 1pm). Music for all. Music as the resurrection of hope (to quote Gustavo's words to me). I went to the rehearsal and sat mesmerised by them - these guys give everything. So, too, did the National Youth Choir of Great Britain, so you don't have to be Venezuelan... The churlish have been out in force, predictably, carping on about tempi being too slow, edges being too rough, and so on. There's still an element in British life that loathes anything too successful. Most of us saw past that to the essence of the event, and took it all to our hearts, where it belongs. The point of this Prom was not to offer benchmark Mahler to compete against the recordings of Tennstedt, Bernstein et al. What had to be definitive was the honesty and passionate nature of the music-making, the symbol, the life-affirming pulling-together of it all. Yes, it was the event that came first, and there is nothing wrong with that - not when it's an event you'll remember until your last breath. If every concert could be an event on such a scale, nobody would ever have talked of classical music 'dying', because it couldn't be clearer that that is not true, never was and certainly won't be as long as these guys are around.
It's been one thing after another at the Proms, and yesterday I caught up not only with the Mahler but also with the National Youth Orchestra with Benjamin Grosvenor and Vlad, plus Nigel's very late-night Bach. Benjamin played the Britten Concerto - a terrific piece and much underrated. It's very much of its 1930s day, a British cousin to Bartok and Prokofiev, and Benjamin's coolly ironic eye and deft, light-sprung touch suited it to a T. Vlad wrought dynamic stuff from the orchestra, too - they're not the Bolivars, but they're the creme-de-la-creme of what young British musicians can be. And full marks to everyone for bringing Gabriel Prokofiev mainstream, putting his Concerto for Orchestra and Turntables centre stage in the Royal Albert Hall. Sergey's grandson may have 'Nonclassical' as his brand-name, but the piece, even with all its 21st-century irony, humour and imagination, still reminded us at times of The Rite of Spring. Character, precision and charm were everywhere; and the Radio 3 announcer's apparent bemusement about the whole spectacle had a type of charm all its own. He even considered DJ Switch's light-blue tee-shirt worth remarking upon.
I missed Saturday evening in London because I went to work with Tomcat. Which means I cried my eyes out over Rusalka. Watch out for the marvellous Dina Kuznetsova (left), a big Russian voice with a great heart to match, her every phrase serving Rusalka's searing emotional journey. Melly Still's production is magical - a timeless fairy-tale taken on its own terms, mildly modernised and exquisitely imagined. We know the Freudian ins and outs of the story's psychological implications well enough these days to add our own interpretation, if desired - it's refreshing that directors need no longer bash us over the head with it, and we can enjoy Dvorak's folksy joys and quasi-Wagnerian ventures with a view to match.
And Nigel? He's still working his own brand of magic; and it's as irresistible as ever because beneath the famous image is a passionate and phenomenally accomplished musician. He has not only magic, but the staying power that comes from true underlying solidity. Others may try, but there's still only one Nigel.

11 comments:
Jessica,
Honest to goodness, guv, I really believe the world would be a better place if we could all spend more time making or listening to great music and less time on greed, envy, accumulation, materialism and...oh well.
************
Ok but let's not go overboard with this.
We need to keep in mind an important point made by neuroscientist Steven Pinker:
"Compared with language, vision, social reasoning, and physical know-how, music could vanish from our species and the rest of our lifestyle would be virtually unchanged..."
Pinker is wrong, even if he always thinks he's right.
By the way, Jessica, why have you blocked viewers in France from watching Nige?
I haven't, Frank. It's a BBC video and they only allow their uploads to be viewed in the UK. Something to do with the licence fee, I believe.
Oh, and... "music could vanish from our species & the rest of our lifestyle would be virtually unchanged" - wrong. I and my husband both live for music and work with it, so our lives would be wrecked both materially and spiritually. Just so you know.
For the defence, against Pinker, I would cite Oliver Sachs, who says in "Musicophilia", among many other interesting things, that music would seem to be innate and unique in humans. As an example, he describes how a very young child will sway or beat time to music. This potential all too often goes to waste. So, long live El Sistema and "wider still and wider...."
Jessica and Frank,
Let's be clear about something:
He makes no pretense to explain or even comment on the aesthetic, spiritual, or metaphysical qualities (or any qualities at all) of music. He is a SCIENTIST who studies brain function; he comments only on the measurable energy in the brain generated in response to measurable stimuli. The responses may occur in different locations in the brain, with differing intensities, but the cultural significance of the stimuli is irrelevant to Pinker's interests and cannot be identified based on the measured response.
For that matter, responses occurring in the same area of the brain, with similar intensities, may be equated even if the stimuli are of entirely different kinds or characters.
So there is no point in asking Pinker for thoughts on the ability of a Beethoven quartet or a Schubert sonata or a Wagner opera to inspire higher thoughts or exalted emotions, since those are not measurable by his methods and really not of much interest in the context of his research. (You can make your own judgment about the relative value of the research, given those limitations.)
Again, aesthetic or metaphysical commentary is not a part of what he does.
Pinker acknowledges the existence of pleasure center in the brain, but he treats music as "pure pleasure technology" that does little more than trigger these centers in order to deliver "little jolts of enjoyment." The pleasure that we feel is biologically pointless -- no higher purpose is being served by it. It is merely an evolutionary side-effect.
Oliver Sacks (as I should have spelled his name) is also a scientist. I believe there is more than pleasure involved in making or listening to music and that it has the capacity to make one a better person, more sensitive and aware to a variety of feelings expressed by a variety of other human beings; more open to different cultures and beliefs. There are, of course, some fine human beings not interested in music at all. Perhaps I should have said, "Music makes us better than we would have been without it."
Frank wrote:
Music has the capacity to make one a better person...
********
A better person?
Ok, now you are going a bit too far.
Complete bollocks.
"bollocks" eh UP, that's a big strong word, it must clearly win the argument. Or perhaps, just perhaps there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
James,
You don't like 'bollocks'?
Ok, how about caca de toro?
This idea that listening to or creating music can somehow influence moral behavior is absurd.
For starters, it is already well established that music activates some of the same reward systems that are stimulated by food, sex and addictive drugs.
Hey, chaps, chaps... I think if you look at certain music education schemes around the world - El Sistema, Buskaid and Sistema Scotland in Raploch, for starters - the proof is *absolutely incontrovertible* that youngsters' behaviour has been altered for the better. This arguably could be down to the discipline, attention, high demands and group activity of music-making and tuition on a strong regular basis, rather than necessarily the actual music - but it does help those it reaches.
Post a Comment