Kicking
off the Olympic cultural festivities in style, The Dude and his Simon Bolivár Orchestra
of Venezuela are back in Britain. Dudamel & co are taking over the Royal Festival Hall
this weekend (concerts to be streamed live on The Guardian website, btw), and right now they’re in Raploch, Scotland, visiting the Big
Noise project – Sistema Scotland’s own take on the Venezuelan music education
scheme, revolutionising children’s lives through the making of music (an illuminating read about it here). We can
see this concert on TV tomorrow, live on BBC4.
But one
question remains: why are we all so potty about Venezuelan young musicians when
the UK has plenty of its own?
Britain’s
got talent. And the real talent has little to do with Simon Cowell, but everything
to do with our youth orchestras. The National Youth Orchestra of Great Britain is
a prime training ground for the best young orchestral musicians in the country;
to hear them is to be bowled over and out by the standard of their playing, and
the passion and dedication they show for their music.
Nor are they alone. The
National Youth Orchestra of Wales claims to have been the first national youth
orchestra in the world. The National Youth Orchestras of Scotland, the NationalYouth Choirs and the award-winning National Youth Choir of Scotland are all
flourishing. The Aldeburgh Young Musicians, based at Snape in Suffolk, takes
around 40 talented kids aged ten to 18 from the East Anglia area and provides
them with high-level courses in school holidays, treating them not as children,
but as young artists who compose, conduct and perform their own music.
What’s
the matter with us, then? Why do we fête the Venezuelans instead? What on earth
do they have that we haven’t?
It would
be easy to say “Nothing”. It would be easy to pretend that the Simon Bolivárs
are all show and no substance: the twirling basses, the football shirts, all
that Latin heat and light. But, though it pains me to say it, there is
something. And it’s the other way round. It’s something that we have that they
don’t have that’s the cause.
In a
recent interview for The Strad, I
asked Levon Chilingirian, leader of the Chilingirian String Quartet, what he
thought about this. He and his three colleagues visit Caracas regularly to
coach the students of El Sistema in chamber music. “One aspect which is very
different from here,” he says, “is that they don’t have any limits set for them.”
Many children learning music in the UK work their way through the Associated
Board grade exams system by hook or by crook. “Mostly by crook as far as I can
see,” Chilingirian adds. “It can be a case of: ‘You do your Grade V this year
and next year I’ll give you a nice present when you do Grade VI’. And if you suggest
to someone that they might learn a particular piece, they’ll say ‘No, no, that’s
Grade VII and I’m only Grade IV.”
That
doesn’t happen in Caracas. Chilingirian met a young violinist who’d been
learning for only a year, but brought the Bruch Violin Concerto No.1 to a
lesson and was determined to perform it with an orchestra soon afterwards. The
group also told me about a 23-year-old taxi driver who, bored with his job, met
some youngsters from El Sistema, heard about their work and decided to become a
cellist, having never touched an instrument before. “Nobody said ‘You can’t’
- so he did it,” says Chilingirian. “He’s a very accomplished player.”
Music
exams in Britain are an extremely mixed blessing. On the plus side, they
provide a target to work towards, a chance for youngsters to prove themselves
and gain a sense of achievement. The exams set by the Associated Board of the
Royal Schools of Music in particular are a global success story, a system
embraced wholeheartedly in countries the world over, notably the Far East.
And yet,
and yet... How many people in the UK have horror stories to tell about childhood
music exams? How many youngsters who might have gone on to enjoy making music
socially are left with a terror of performing after an unfortunate sojourn in the exam room? How many have had a bad experience and given up, because working
for an exam is no fun at all? For many of us, these exams are our first-ever try at playing to other people, and an unhappy start can leave deep
scars.
This set-up is
satisfactory for very few. The examiner has little space to write notes and
very, very little time in which to do so. Sight-reading tests rarely bear any
relation to real music. The pieces offer a bit of choice, yet so
little that often a child has to spend months practising something that he or she
doesn’t even like – and then, of course, it often sounds like it, too. And sometimes
a candidate’s chin wobbles or the eyes start to brim, but an examiner can’t take
time to reassure them, because the system is a conveyor belt - the next
candidates are in the waiting room building up their own store of nerves and mustn’t
be kept waiting. This is an exam all right. But is that any way to make music?
It’s
worth reflecting that in a target-oriented, achievement-focused society
blighted by the class-ridden nature of the education system, children have to
be very lucky to find themselves making music for the sake of enjoying it. Oftener than not
they do so to please their parents, to win a music scholarship (few parents
realise the hard work involved in that), to pass exams that will allow them to
go on and pass more exams. It’s all about measurement and competition. But for
El Sistema, it’s about personal and social transformation.
Maybe it’s no wonder that many successful British professional musicians of my acquaintance never went through the graded exam system at all; if someone is more than averagely talented, exams quickly become an irrelevance. Do they hold the students back? I believe so. Just think about scales. You could learn them all. But if your grade prescribes only a certain number of them, you’re probably going to bother learning just those few, aren’t you? Levon Chilingirian is right: music exams instil the sense of an invisible ceiling that we dare not shatter. Rarely are we encouraged to chuck out the exam books, find a piece of music we love and damn well learn how to play it, even if it’s by Rachmaninov. That would be real motivation: a passion from within.
Plenty
of other ways exist to learn and make music, and plenty exist in the UK. There’s
Colourstrings, for example – a Saturday morning music school derived from
Zoltán Kodály’s famous Hungarian system in which every child first learns to sing; they
subsequently develop excellently trained 'ears'. The kids perform to one
another in relaxed concert days, play in ensembles together early on and seem confident
with their instruments.
And now we have pockets of El Sistema too: with enthusiasm for these schemes taking root around the country - the Big Noise in Scotland and In Harmony across England, in centres including Lambeth, Liverpool and more - there’s hope that our youngsters may also discover, like the Venezuelans, that making music is about joy, life and love. Not about quaking in your shoes alone with your half-size violin in a chilly school gym in Hatch End.
And now we have pockets of El Sistema too: with enthusiasm for these schemes taking root around the country - the Big Noise in Scotland and In Harmony across England, in centres including Lambeth, Liverpool and more - there’s hope that our youngsters may also discover, like the Venezuelans, that making music is about joy, life and love. Not about quaking in your shoes alone with your half-size violin in a chilly school gym in Hatch End.
The
Venezuelans are back? Bring 'em on. We need their inspiration. It’s working. It
needs to work some more.
UPDATE, 5.40pm: This is clearly ringing some bells, and not just in the UK. Try this post by John Terauds from Musical Toronto: http://musicaltoronto.org/2012/06/20/music-exams-can-be-limitations-instead-of-goals/
UPDATE, 5.40pm: This is clearly ringing some bells, and not just in the UK. Try this post by John Terauds from Musical Toronto: http://musicaltoronto.org/2012/06/20/music-exams-can-be-limitations-instead-of-goals/
4 comments:
I think there are two points here - the first is that we're very good at inventing things in the UK and then criticising them immediately or they just go out of fashion. Take for instance Curwen's work on tonic sol-fa, introduced to enable the church congregations to "...sing with ease and propriety". Kodaly was so impressed with it he took it home along with the French time name system and introduced it to Hungary. Instead of developing this ourselves, we now fall over ourselves when a Hungarian visits us and explains how the Kodaly system works. Why aren't we the experts?
I also agree with your point about the grade system, but would say that I think things are a lot better than they used to be with a lot more choice in forging a path in music. I was a very average performer and in my school only those showing prowess on an instrument were encouraged to pursue a musical career. I was told not to go on to A level music, then not to entertain studying music at degree level - maybe do a combined degree or become a teacher. I didn't listen to any of this advice but went on to Dartington College of Arts where opportunities opened up and new musical possibilities abounded. So I now have a degree, a diploma in Music Education from Trinity and a Masters in Music Education from London Institute of Education. My programme for teaching music to under-fives reaches children all over the country and i have so much fun and satisfaction seeing what they are capable of.
Karen Dickinson. Director Music for Little People. www.musicforlittlepeople.co.uk
Graded music exams are a useful benchmark and many students (and teachers) want to take them to see how they measure up against their peers. However, in the 6 years I have been teaching piano, I have found the ABRSM exam board to be inflexible and rather old-fashioned, with its emphasis on learning 100s of scales, sight-reading from Grade 1 (which terrifies many young learners) and very pedestrian repertoire right up to Grade 8. No wonder children & young people are put off music lessons! Last year I switched to Trinity Guildhall, which offers a more varied and flexible approach to graded exams. No sight-reading until Grade 6, and the option to offer improvisation in the exam, as well as a test called Musical Knowledge, which encourages more in-depth study of the music students are learning. The emphasis is on performing (right up to Fellowship level), and I feel that the syllabus and choice of repertoire allows students more space to develop as musicians.
I have very bad memories of music exams and dull music lessons as a child and teenager, and when I started teaching I decided that enjoyment and excitement were two key areas I would explore. Learning music should be fun: if a teacher can't convey that in their teaching, they shouldn't be teaching! Also, I feel all children who are learning a musical instrument should be encouraged to play in an ensemble - orchestra, wind band, recorder group whatever - in order to experience the sheer joy and excitement of making music with other people. This, of course, is what Dudamel & the young people in the Simon Bolivar Orchestra convey so convincingly: they are clearly loving every moment of it.
100% in agreement!
Robin started classical guitar with the Bach Chaconne and had no musical qualifications of any kind when he arrived at music college, he could just play. Once there he immediately took grade 8 and the rest is history...
But I should add that the first music college he auditioned with refused to let him play the Bach Chaconne as they said it was too difficult. Hope they regret that decision now.
I couldn't agree more! I've been banging my drum about the perils of music exams here in Goa India for some time now. The British exams (ABRSM, Trinity & now Trinity Guildhall) have a huge following and are a big money-spinner. But despite this, and often even when candidates have gone on to get very good percentages, it just doesn't show in the playing ability of the youth at all. There's no musicality, and a complete shallowness in terms of knowledge about music history, styles, composers, etc etc. If it's not in the syllabus, it's just not important. But parents want it, because other parents' kids are doing them, and they can't let their kids get "left behind". Exams are more of a hindrance to the learning and enjoyment of music than any advantage they might offer. True, there's the motivation factor to practise, and a sense of accomplishment on having passed, but sadly very little else!
And worse, it means that anyone who's passed a certain exam now feels competent to start teaching in India! And there's no means of quality control or regulating this.
I wish the ABRSM, TCL would take stock of this, and realise the ills that come with their exam system which is so sought after all over the world (albeit not always for the right reasons).
Post a Comment