I'm just back from a few days away for much-needed crashout. Before I left on Tuesday, I wrote this post for the Ghost Variations "shed", headed "Why this, why now?". It's about the relevance of the 1933-38 setting of the book to today; and how it brings together three matters poised together on the brink, tipping over from something that was fine if troubled to something tumbling towards illness, insanity and fascism, whether that is our heroine, or Schumann, or the world.
Forty-eight hours later, it was even more relevant than I'd thought. These are grim times in Britain, with the EU referendum having opened a Pandora's Box and unleashed monstrosities that run contrary to everything humanity at its best can and should stand for. Yesterday a Labour MP was shot and killed outside her constituency office by, allegedly, a mentally ill man with far-right associations. And next week's referendum could still be part of the beginning, not the end.
Friday, June 17, 2016
Monday, June 13, 2016
They can't take that away from us...
...to misquote Ira Gershwin.
I'm puzzled beyond puzzlement about the toxic idea that the EU is somehow putting British culture under threat and that we should gamble our economy, complete with everyone's livelihoods and kids' futures, in order to protect this oddly nebulous idea. As we've been in the EU for around four decades, perhaps we should have a look at those things that nobody has ever taken away from us, nor ever will (unless our currency plunges, our pay and pensions disappear and we can't afford anything more...which will only happen if we leave...).
Here's my Top 100 of British Culture, in no particular order other than putting Shakespeare first.
1. William Shakespeare
2. John Donne
3. Jane Austen
4. George Eliot
5. Henry Purcell
6. Orlando Gibbons
7. Ralph Vaughan Williams
8. Edward Elgar
9. Frederick Delius
10. The Wigmore Hall
11. Symphony Hall, Birmingham
12. Simon Rattle
13. Dame Myra Hess
14. Monty Python
15. Wimbledon
16. Lindisfarne
17. The Sage, Gateshead
18. The Peak District
19. John Keats
20. Charlotte Bronte
21. Emily Bronte
22. Glyndebourne
23. Hilary Mantel
24. Rose Tremain
25. Henry Moore
26. Turner
27. Gainsborough
28. The Beatles
29. Benjamin Britten
30. Aldeburgh
31. Kent apples
32. Scones & jam & cream
33. Sunday roast
34. Gilbert & Sullivan
35. The Isle of Eigg (well, they could take that away if we leave Europe & then Scotland leaves England as a result. But the Western Isles are among the most beautiful spots on this planet...)
36. DH Lawrence
37. Laurence Olivier
38. Mark Rylance
39. Dame Judi Dench
40. Helen Mirren
41. Colin Firth
42. The Goons
43. Just A Minute (sort of)
44. English spellings
45. Rose gardens like Regent's Park and Mottisfont Abbey
46. The boat race
47. Dartington
48. Tintagel
49. Tristan & Isolde being set in Cornwall
50. Fish & chips, which I used to like
51. The Southbank Centre
52. Trafalgar Square
53. The Kindertransport
54. Richmond Park
55. Roxanna Panufnik
56. Lincoln Cathedral
57. Errollyn Wallen
58. Stratford-upon-Avon
59. The RSC
60. The Royal Opera House
61. English National Opera...
62. Thomas Hardy
63. Pimms
64. The Two Ronnies
65. Dad's Army
66. Victoria Wood
67. Edward Gardner
68. Tasmin Little
69. Chandos Records
70. Hyperion Records
71. Wendy Cope
72. JK Rowling & Harry Potter
73. Lewis Carroll
74. AA Milne & Winnie-the-Pooh
75. Dodie Smith
76. Imogen Cooper
77. Paul Lewis
78. Hay-on-Wye
79. Salman Rushdie
80. Ian McEwan
81. Vikram Seth
82. The walk to Kingston along the river from Richmond
83. Edinburgh (+ see Isle of Eigg)
84. Anish Kapoor
85. Matthew Bourne's New Adventures
86. Judith Weir
87. The South Downs
88. York Minster
89. Durham Cathedral
90. Hampstead Heath
91. Thomas Adès
92. Michael Tippett
93. Jacqueline du Pré
94. Elderflower cordial
95. David Beckham
96. The Royal Ballet
97. Mary Shelley
98. Bram Stoker
99. Tough gun laws
100. The Channel Tunnel.
A reminder: NONE of this is "under threat" from the EU, nor ever has been, nor ever will be. British culture is flourishing quite happily within it.
I'm puzzled beyond puzzlement about the toxic idea that the EU is somehow putting British culture under threat and that we should gamble our economy, complete with everyone's livelihoods and kids' futures, in order to protect this oddly nebulous idea. As we've been in the EU for around four decades, perhaps we should have a look at those things that nobody has ever taken away from us, nor ever will (unless our currency plunges, our pay and pensions disappear and we can't afford anything more...which will only happen if we leave...).
Roses. Best of British, growing happily within the EU |
Here's my Top 100 of British Culture, in no particular order other than putting Shakespeare first.
1. William Shakespeare
2. John Donne
3. Jane Austen
4. George Eliot
5. Henry Purcell
6. Orlando Gibbons
7. Ralph Vaughan Williams
8. Edward Elgar
9. Frederick Delius
10. The Wigmore Hall
11. Symphony Hall, Birmingham
12. Simon Rattle
13. Dame Myra Hess
14. Monty Python
15. Wimbledon
16. Lindisfarne
17. The Sage, Gateshead
18. The Peak District
19. John Keats
20. Charlotte Bronte
21. Emily Bronte
22. Glyndebourne
23. Hilary Mantel
24. Rose Tremain
25. Henry Moore
26. Turner
27. Gainsborough
28. The Beatles
29. Benjamin Britten
30. Aldeburgh
31. Kent apples
32. Scones & jam & cream
33. Sunday roast
34. Gilbert & Sullivan
35. The Isle of Eigg (well, they could take that away if we leave Europe & then Scotland leaves England as a result. But the Western Isles are among the most beautiful spots on this planet...)
36. DH Lawrence
37. Laurence Olivier
38. Mark Rylance
39. Dame Judi Dench
40. Helen Mirren
41. Colin Firth
42. The Goons
43. Just A Minute (sort of)
44. English spellings
45. Rose gardens like Regent's Park and Mottisfont Abbey
46. The boat race
47. Dartington
48. Tintagel
49. Tristan & Isolde being set in Cornwall
50. Fish & chips, which I used to like
51. The Southbank Centre
52. Trafalgar Square
53. The Kindertransport
54. Richmond Park
55. Roxanna Panufnik
56. Lincoln Cathedral
57. Errollyn Wallen
58. Stratford-upon-Avon
59. The RSC
60. The Royal Opera House
61. English National Opera...
62. Thomas Hardy
63. Pimms
64. The Two Ronnies
65. Dad's Army
66. Victoria Wood
67. Edward Gardner
68. Tasmin Little
69. Chandos Records
70. Hyperion Records
71. Wendy Cope
72. JK Rowling & Harry Potter
73. Lewis Carroll
74. AA Milne & Winnie-the-Pooh
75. Dodie Smith
76. Imogen Cooper
77. Paul Lewis
78. Hay-on-Wye
79. Salman Rushdie
80. Ian McEwan
81. Vikram Seth
82. The walk to Kingston along the river from Richmond
83. Edinburgh (+ see Isle of Eigg)
84. Anish Kapoor
85. Matthew Bourne's New Adventures
86. Judith Weir
87. The South Downs
88. York Minster
89. Durham Cathedral
90. Hampstead Heath
91. Thomas Adès
92. Michael Tippett
93. Jacqueline du Pré
94. Elderflower cordial
95. David Beckham
96. The Royal Ballet
97. Mary Shelley
98. Bram Stoker
99. Tough gun laws
100. The Channel Tunnel.
A reminder: NONE of this is "under threat" from the EU, nor ever has been, nor ever will be. British culture is flourishing quite happily within it.
Friday, June 10, 2016
A counter-tenor with a few big differences
Yaniv d'Or |
I had a wonderful interview with Yaniv the other day about how he got started, what a fight he had with various educational establishments in order to be able to sing the way he wanted to, and how he evolved this heartfelt project. Part of its driving force is about bringing people together – bridging cultural, religious and ethnic differences by finding our shared musical roots and transcending the lot.
Here's the piece (lead feature in this week's JC, out today) and below, an introduction from Yaniv himself about the project and a taster of the music. Enjoy.
Labels:
Latino-Ladino,
Yaniv d'Or
Thursday, June 09, 2016
It's the first night of ENO's Tristan
[FRIDAY MORNING, 10 JUNE: OH DEAR. The trouble with writing previews is that sometimes the reality does not deliver. Warning: the value of investments can go down as well as up....
I'm leaving my original preview up here, but after seeing the performance I have to report that though it was many things, Gesamtkunstwerk it ain't.]
The last Tristan und Isolde I saw was Katherina Wagner's production at Bayreuth 2015. Interesting moments, striking designs, but by and large it was a disappointment. Firstly because there seemed no coherence between the three acts - the style of each was so different that a massive disconnect ensued. Secondly, and more importantly, it imposed on the opera a heap of stuff that simply isn't in it and ultimately subverted the whole point. King Marke is not a vicious dictator. It's not in his music or his words or the drama. And in this miserable vision's finale, he simply dragged Isolde away from the dead Tristan's bed and marched her off. Liebestod schmiebestod.
Having just seen a Manon Lescaut in Munich that didn't make much sense either until the final Kaufmann-Opolais act (which was stupendous), I started to wonder if I was going off Regietheater.
I love radical reinterpretations when they bring us new insights and "relevance" that is actually relevant to the opera as well as the supposed audience. Hats off to Calixto Bieito's The Force of Destiny at ENO, which just days ago won a South Bank Sky Arts Award. But when I talked to Iván Fischer a couple of months ago, I did begin to wonder if he was right: we need to start exploring a "third way" to present opera that does not alienate newcomers and fans alike, yet that also isn't stuck in some imaginary golden age of pretty dresses, painted backdrops and park-and-bark. Something, instead, that brings the music and the drama into one "integrated" whole.
So with Tristan and Isolde opening tonight at ENO - Daniel Kramer directing, Ed Gardner conducting, designs by Anish Kapoor and singers including Stuart Skelton, Heidi Melton, Karen Cargill and Matthew Rose - I wrote this little think-piece for the Indy about whether a refreshed take on Wagner's notion of Gesamtkunstwerk can help to save ENO. First, a foretaste of the love duet from rehearsals...
I'm leaving my original preview up here, but after seeing the performance I have to report that though it was many things, Gesamtkunstwerk it ain't.]
The last Tristan und Isolde I saw was Katherina Wagner's production at Bayreuth 2015. Interesting moments, striking designs, but by and large it was a disappointment. Firstly because there seemed no coherence between the three acts - the style of each was so different that a massive disconnect ensued. Secondly, and more importantly, it imposed on the opera a heap of stuff that simply isn't in it and ultimately subverted the whole point. King Marke is not a vicious dictator. It's not in his music or his words or the drama. And in this miserable vision's finale, he simply dragged Isolde away from the dead Tristan's bed and marched her off. Liebestod schmiebestod.
Having just seen a Manon Lescaut in Munich that didn't make much sense either until the final Kaufmann-Opolais act (which was stupendous), I started to wonder if I was going off Regietheater.
I love radical reinterpretations when they bring us new insights and "relevance" that is actually relevant to the opera as well as the supposed audience. Hats off to Calixto Bieito's The Force of Destiny at ENO, which just days ago won a South Bank Sky Arts Award. But when I talked to Iván Fischer a couple of months ago, I did begin to wonder if he was right: we need to start exploring a "third way" to present opera that does not alienate newcomers and fans alike, yet that also isn't stuck in some imaginary golden age of pretty dresses, painted backdrops and park-and-bark. Something, instead, that brings the music and the drama into one "integrated" whole.
So with Tristan and Isolde opening tonight at ENO - Daniel Kramer directing, Ed Gardner conducting, designs by Anish Kapoor and singers including Stuart Skelton, Heidi Melton, Karen Cargill and Matthew Rose - I wrote this little think-piece for the Indy about whether a refreshed take on Wagner's notion of Gesamtkunstwerk can help to save ENO. First, a foretaste of the love duet from rehearsals...
Tonight English National Opera opens a new
production of Tristan and Isolde, Richard Wagner’s gigantic, groundbreaking
hymn to love and Schopenhauerian philosophy. With designs by the artist Anish
Kapoor, ENO’s ex-music director Edward Gardner conducting, direction by Daniel
Kramer – the company’s artistic director elect – and a starry cast featuring
the Australian tenor Stuart Skelton as Tristan, it promises much. ENO, strapped
for cash and mired in controversy, badly needs a smash hit, other than Sunset
Boulevard; hopes ride high that this could be it.
Kramer has described the production as “a
very poetical, mythical, simple world that Anish Kapoor and I have created to
let the music and the singers just become gods”. This feels unusually close to
Wagner’s own ideal. In 1849, the composer wrote a series of essays entitled The
Artwork of the Future, expounding the idea of a “Gesamtkunstwerk”: a complete
art work, fusing together music, drama, design, dance and more, in which a
fellowship of artists would work together towards one shared goal.
Today, though, this is radical in its own
way. And here’s why.
ENO's image for Tristan |
There’s a Facebook group called “Against
Modern Opera Productions”. No, really, there is. It loves “beauty” and often pours
vitriol upon “Regietheater”, the director-led concepts that have dominated
European lyric stages for the past several decades. Some critics, academics and
opera professionals watch its hatred with a fascination of horror. It feels
reactionary; as if operas’ blood-and-guts tales of sex and violence can only
succeed if prettified for some imagined 1950s golden age. Yet this group currently
boasts well over 35,500 “likes”. That’s enough people to fill the beleagured
London Coliseum for nearly a fortnight.
Is the operatic audience really in revolt
against Regietheater? Recently the Hungarian conductor Iván Fischer told me in
an interview here that he was seeking ways to develop “organic, integrated opera
performances”. In his view, the disconnect between staging and music that can
result from focus on supposed originality in the former and on historical
accuracy in the latter has run its course. It’s become a cliché and it’s time
for a change.
When Regietheater is inspired and coherent,
when it truly casts valuable new light on a familiar masterwork, there is
nothing better. I admire and enjoy the finest of it. Yet reluctantly I’m
starting to agree that the operatic sphere needs to find new types of approach
less likely to put off newcomers and frustrate fans. Success stories seem to be
thinner on the ground than duds and in certain territories audiences have
started to vote with their feet. As for the singers, I once asked the tenor
Joseph Calleja what the most outrageous thing is that a director has asked him
to do on stage. His answer: “Singing the Duke of Mantua [in Verdi’s Rigoletto]
wearing a monkey suit.” The production was set on the Planet of the Apes.
Tannhäuser at Bayreuth Enrico Nawrath/© Bayreuther Festspiele |
A couple of years ago I attended Wagner’s Tannhäuser
at Bayreuth, the festival founded by the composer himself. It was staged as an
opera-within-an-opera: a supposedly futuristic society putting on a show. The
set was dominated by a huge processing machine glooping away throughout; the concept must have cost a pretty penny to design and produce, yet added to the opera…precisely
nothing. Last year the same festival’s new Tristan und Isolde imposed a
vicious, dictatorial character on King Marke that simply isn’t in the music or
the drama. And the lovers had to sing their heavenly duet with their backs to
the audience.
That festival appears still to be able to
afford controversy, indeed to court it. But in the UK cash for opera companies
is ever more difficult to come by and increasingly requires justification. If a
new staging of a popular piece goes clunking to an early death, there’s a sense
of tragic waste. Yes, artists and companies need space to fail. But that space
is getting smaller every year.
Still, the Metropolitan Opera in New York
has not been enjoying much success of late with supposedly safe, traditional productions.
The current season is projected to reach only 66 per cent of potential box
office revenue, its lowest ever. Some punters, and even some critics, would like
ENO to stay safe and traditional too: middle-of-road productions of popular
repertoire for middle-class audiences. But that’s not how London works these
days, or New York. These audiences can mingle eager newbies with knowledgeable,
cosmopolitan types; and none like to feel they’re being fobbed off with
something predictable and second-rate any more than with something pretentious or
incoherent. If opera houses want audiences, they have to find out how that
audience functions now and what its needs are. These are not the same as the
1950s. They’re not even the same as the 2000s.
And so a radical readoption of Wagner’s Gesamtkunstwerk
principles might hold some answers, along with Fischer’s “integrated” approach.
It’s possible to be wonderfully imaginative, sophisticated and stylish while working
in harmony, rather than in a seeming struggle between inherently opposed
ideals.
If Kramer can indeed bring ENO a strong,
simple, transcendental Tristan, perhaps he can signal a way forward for the
troubled company. Can Wagner’s Gesamtkunstwerk save ENO? It’s time to find out.
Tristan
and Isolde, English National Opera, London Coliseum, from 9 June. Box office: 020 7845 9300
Labels:
ENO,
Tristan and Isolde
Saturday, June 04, 2016
Opera North's treasurable Ring: a guest review by Timothy Fancourt QC
Regrettably I haven't been able to attend Opera North's much-lauded Ring cycle myself, but a great friend and passionate Wagnerian Timothy Fancourt QC has, and he's offered us a guest review. Below, delighted to run it. JD
Following Ring cycles at the Proms (2014) and at Bayreuth
(2015), this reviewer headed to Leeds Town Hall last week with no sense that
anything inferior was about to be served up by Opera North. Indeed, after the egregious nonsense of the
Bayreuth production, the simple, semi-staged and beautifully lit production of
Peter Mumford was a revelation of how effective the drama in the Ring can be
when the music is allowed to speak largely for itself. Wieland Wagner would have approved heartily.
Orchestra of Opera North and conductor Richard Farnes in Leeds Town Hall. Photo: Clive Barda |
A RING TO TREASURE
The four
operas have been built up by Opera North over the last four years and have
received hugely commendatory reviews in the process. This year the Ring is presented as a full
cycle, in the traditional format of a week with days off in between. It is of course a totally different
experience: the musical language develops and mutates over three nights, so that by
Götterdämmerung every note derives dramatic and musical resonance from the
events in the 11 hours that have preceded it.
The same themes permeate the whole, but take on different colours and
nuances as the story develops. The
demands made of the audience are considerable, but so are the rewards.
The
first word must go to the orchestra of Opera North and the conductor, Richard
Farnes. The orchestral playing was of a
very high quality, one or two minor lapses of concentration excepted. It is clear that the orchestra has benefited
greatly from the incremental building up of the Ring over years, and the
considerable technical demands of the music were met with aplomb
throughout. What is also clear is that
there is a huge commitment and level of enthusiasm about the project and the
music. It is easy to see this when the
orchestra is on stage, exposed to full view, but also in the corridors and on
the steps of the Town Hall in the intervals, where cast, musicians and audience
happily exchange thoughts and compliments. The majority of the orchestra was on stage 15 minutes before each opera
started, and numerous players remained on stage after each lengthy act,
practising for the one to follow.
Wolfgang Ablinger-Sperrhacke as Loge. Photo: Clive Barda |
Mr Farnes’
conducting is a revelation too (to those who have not enjoyed it previously). In London it is easy to forget that other parts
of the country boast conductors who really do understand Wagner’s music and
have it in their blood. His conducting
style is calm and his beat clear: no histrionics; no heaving and subsiding with
the musical flow. In Das Rheingold,
which overall was the least convincing performance, the music was sometimes a
bit one-paced, without time to breathe on occasions, and without bite and zip
when needed to lend colour to the black comedy being enacted on stage. The ensemble went awry for a while at the
start of Scene 4, where the vocal lines and the orchestral commentary are at
their most complex. But the difficulty
of conducting with one’s back to the actors/singers must be considerable, and
overall Mr Farnes achieved a wonderful sound and cohesion. A special mention for Wolfgang
Ablinger-Sperrhacke, whose Loge was beautifully judged and acted, a
personification of flickering fire, volatility, insecurity and cunning.
In Die Walküre, the orchestral
sound blossomed fully and the effect was powerful and beautiful in equal
measure. Some lovely moments in the
woodwind in the middle section of Act 2 (and later in Act 2 of Siegfried) will
stay long in the memory. Leeds had a
Siegmund (Michael Weinius) and Sieglinde (Lee Bisset) to relish, and each acted
with great delicacy of expression and movement and sang to a very high
standard. Indeed, one had to pinch
oneself to remember that all this was being presented in Leeds Town Hall and
not in the Metropolitan Opera. Reginald
Goodall used to say, with only a hint of irony, that he was not sure that he
had really mastered the end of Act 3 of Die Walküre. I have never heard it more perfectly judged
and played than here: the beauty and colour of the music deliciously set off by
the shocking personal tragedy happening on stage, for which equal credit is due
to Kelly Cae Hogan (Brünnhilde) and Robert Hayward (Wotan). Ms Hogan sang wonderfully well: she is
confident, technically secure, acts well, and produces a beautiful but well
structured sound.
Siegfried is sometimes regarded
as the weak link in the cycle. Not
here. The orchestral playing was nothing
short of superb throughout, with Mr Farnes finding space and colour for all the
subtleties of the music. A great deal
depends on the eponymous hero, of course, and Leeds was very lucky to have a
recently-engaged Lars Cleveman, who sang to a very high standard, with lovely
bright tones, clear diction, faultless intonation and considerable reserves of
energy. His voice was well contrasted by
the character tenor of Richard Roberts (Mime), whose acting skills were
deployed to memorable effect as the evil, scheming dwarf. The musical high at the start of Act 3, with
Wotan, Erda and Siegfried, suffered something of a fall when a different
Brünnhilde was kissed awake. Ms
Broderick unfortunately fell short of the very high standards of the rest of
the cast and the musical intensity was lost, which was a great shame. (Ms Hogan will sing throughout in London.)
Götterdämmerung is and was the
pinnacle of the cycle. A different
Siegfried was with us, Mati Turi, who, while not reaching that heights that Mr
Cleveman reached, let no one down, despite some dryness and lack of colour at
the top of his range. The show was once
again stolen by the orchestral playing and by Ms Hogan, whose scene with
Waltraute (Susan Bickley) in Act 1 was exquisitely performed, a telling
portrayal of human characters who were once godlike and close but who now live
in different worlds and no longer speak the same language. A very well sung Gunther (Andrew
Foster-Williams) and Gutrune (Giselle Allen) contributed to the awful
denouement, manipulated almost to the point of success by the Hagen of Mats
Almgren. Mr Almgren, with resonant deep
bass voice and German pronunciation that seems to emanate from some primordial
middle earth, had been a fearsome Fafner and was no less fearsome in this
opera, bringing off a superbly chilling Rhine watch scene in Act 1 and the Siegfried’s Ende trio with Gunther and
Brünnhilde at the end of Act 2. No one
doubted that Ms Hogan would steal the show at the end, which she did,
unforgettably.
So palmes d’or for the orchestra,
Mr Farnes and Ms Hogan, and one other character who I have not mentioned so
far, but who appears throughout the cycle. The anti-hero Alberich, who is cruelly abused by the gods and then disdained
and dismissed by his son, who for the merely human misjudgement of preferring
wealth to love sets the whole disaster in motion and is condemned to misery. It is a wonderfully ambiguous part, and in
Das Rheingold has some of the best musical lines; here it was sung to
perfection by Jo Pohlheim, whose lovely bass-baritone easily captured the true character
of the villain-victim.
For those who missed it in Leeds,
it is touring Nottingham, Salford, London and Gateshead. London sold out its cycle in May last year, within
days of going on sale, such is the renown of this Opera North production and
the dearth of Ring productions in the capital. For those lucky enough to have a ticket, this really is a Ring to
treasure.
Timothy Fancourt
Labels:
Opera North,
Richard Wagner,
The Ring
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)