Our very old friend Jack Maguire was for many years co-leader of the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra, is now musician-in-residence for the Bournemouth Arts Festival and has a passion for Gypsy music and the folksongs of eastern Europe. He's had some training in the style from the Hungarian Gypsy violinist Josef Szegely. And he took a liking to the idea of doing a Hungarian Dances concert-of-the-novel with me. I'm heading south west tomorrow to meet him and pianist Barbara Henvest for a special performance in the Mary Shelley Theatre, Boscombe Manor. Full details and booking here.
We are adapting the programme in several ways: Kodaly and Faure both put in an appearance, there's to be some bonus Brahms at the beginning, and we are promised a certain authenticity of approach in Monti's Csardas.... There's also a special appearance in the interval by the Hungarian cellist Josef Koos, also ex-BSO, whom I will interview about his experiences escaping Hungary during the revolution in 1956. While I was researching the novel I spent a very happy day visiting Jo for a lengthy discussion. Anyone who has read the book will find certain aspects of him ever so slightly familiar.
This theatre was built for Mary Shelley, author of Frankenstein and wife of the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, in the 1840s. It fell into semi-dereliction (as pictured), but a community project began work on a loving restoration earlier this year, which has included the arrival of 220 seats from the demolished Bournemouth IMAX. Developers have now bought it. A news story from the BBC here.
Best of all: the weather forecast for tomorrow is really not bad, and apparently this place is 200m from the beach.
Do come along if you're in the area!
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Beethovenfest Bonn 1: The Death of Schumann
Yesterday I stood in the room where Schumann died.
It's a little room on the top floor, at the end of a long, old building in Endenich - a rather out-of-the-way and very leafy suburb of Bonn. This house was, in its time, a mental hospital; here Schumann spent the last two-and-a-half years of his life. He had one of the better chambers, with windows on two sides. Today only two rooms of the building form the Schumannhaus museum; downstairs is home to the town's music library and much of the upper floor, before you reach the Schumann space, is taken up by a largish area, bookshelf-lined, that hosts concerts.
In Schumann's room now stands a small piano that was once played by Liszt. Schumann was not allowed a piano there; one feels this instrument's presence is perhaps a rectification of rather an injustice. Atop it is a coverlet that belonged to Schumann's friend Joseph Joachim, the great violinist, embroidered by a number of Berlin ladies with his initials JJ and some musical motifs from his compositions. Photos of Schumann, Clara, Joachim and Brahms adorn the walls, while some of their letters and a copy of the manuscript of the Geistervariationen are on display in glass cases. Among them is Schumann's last (?) letter to Clara, dated about a year before he died. He saw Clara again - and for the last time - only when he was on his deathbed.
Schumann's last illness was pneumonia, brought on by starvation. The info in the museum says that he refused to eat, believing that (as a number of inmates apparently thought) the food was poisoned. I have read opinions elsewhere that suggested he may have been deliberately starving himself - a slow suicide over the fact that there was no way out. The writer Bettina von Arnim, who visited him earlier, had apparently found him in good health and longing to go home. Mental illness at that time was a terrible stigma. Perhaps, effectively, he was being "buried alive".
Here is an extract from the museum's information sheet:
Q: What type of therapy was administered at that time?
A: In those days, medications such as mood brighteners or drugs able to alter or enhance one's mental state did not exist. Dr Richarz advocated a treatment of non-restraint in opposition to coercive torture-like methods practiced in the public "crazy houses" of that time. Some of the therapies which patients were subjected to in good fait, and today seem nonsensical, were the dousing of patients with cold water and the boring of holes in the skull to allow the escape of "bad fluids" - similar to blood-letting. Richarz could not completely do without some of the extreme methods when dealing with severely ill patients (eg strapping patients to their beds). Alcohol was administered as a medication.
Brahms, with Clara and Joachim, hurried to Schumann's bedside when news came to DΓΌsseldorf from the doctors that they must hurry if they wished to see him again. He wrote:
"At first he lay
for a long time with eyes closed, and she knelt before him, more calmly than
one would believe possible. But after a while he recognised her. Once he
plainly desired to embrace her, flung one arm wide around her. Of course he had
been unable to speak for some time already. One could understand (or perhaps
imagine one did) only some disconnected words. Even that must have made her
happy. He often refused the wine that was offered him, but from her finger he
sometimes sucked it up eagerly, at such length and so passionately that one
knew with certainty that he recognised the finger...
Tuesday
noon, we came half an hour after his passing. He had passed away very gently,
so that it was scarcely noticed. His body looked peaceful then; how comforting
it all was. A wife could not have stood it any longer..."
The room is light and peaceful; the chestnut tree beyond the window may or may not have been there then. The scene is almost unimaginable, but we imagine it anyway, as best we can.
I've just been to Bonn for the Beethovenfest. Packed an extraordinary number of amazing experiences into barely two days. Stand by for Beethovenfest post 2 - which might even be about Beethoven...
Saturday, September 21, 2013
JD meets... CALIXTO BIEITO
In which the Bad Boy of Opera turns out to be a pussycat. I went to see him to preview his Fidelio, which opens at ENO this week. Some of the interview is in today's Independent, here, but I am putting the director's cut (ie, long version) below. First, the beginning of his Don Giovanni...
His Fidelio could prove chewy. In Beethoven’s opera, the heroine Leonora’s husband, Florestan, is a political prisoner; she disguises herself as a man named Fidelio to infiltrate the prison and rescue him. Bieito’s staging, unlike his hyper-realistic Carmen and Don Giovanni, is complex and symbolic, set in a labyrinth that some reviewers of its Munich performances compared to The Matrix. “All the characters are lost in the labyrinth, imprisoned,” he says. “Sometimes our minds are our prison. I find Fidelio’s story quite weak if it is approached realistically, but if you take the philosophical side more seriously, then you can say much more about human beings today: what freedom means for us, or love, or loyalty, or justice. That is very important to our democracy.”
You might expect Calixto Bieito to resemble a cross between
Count Dracula and Quentin Tarantino. The Spanish director, often called “the
bad boy of opera”, has become notorious for extreme productions that often
feature explicit sex and violence, their concepts including a cannibalistic
post-nuclear Parsifal and a
present-day Don Giovanni that involved vicious scenes of rape, drug overdose and murder. Audiences at his shows are no strangers to sights that have
variously included toilet activities, nudity and a great deal of blood. Now, in
a co-production with the Bavarian State Opera in Munich, Bieito is bringing his
staging of Beethoven’s Fidelio to ENO
and traditionalists are quaking in their boots.
Yet when he emerges from rehearsals in east London, clad in
his trademark black, it turns out that Bieito is a pussycat. He’s a soft-spoken
family man with a social conscience and anxieties about threats to democracy
and free speech; and he acknowledges that he often takes a bleak view of life.
“I have to be careful,” he says, “because I sometimes suffer from melancholia,
and this is why my work can become quite dark.”
Nevertheless, he seems mystified by the degree of hostility
that’s been expressed against his work. One critic referred to his Don Giovanni as “the most reviled opera
production in the recent history of British theatre”; others believe he is out
to shock. He insists not. “I promise I have never tried to shock people in that
way,” he protests quietly. “I don’t think that doing a show to shock people is
the right way to approach it. The direction must come naturally from inside you.
It’s as if you find the hidden meaning of dreams emerging.”
Such dreams can be fairly horrifying. That Don Giovanni, he says, illustrated “what
happens every Friday night” among young people across Europe, “though with a
very sad ending”. The arrival of the Commendatore to threaten the Don with hell
became a drug-induced hallucination, reducing Giovanni to a helpless wreck; the
other characters then murder him. “I have strong emotional responses, and for
me this Don Giovanni was sad because
there was a sense of no hope,” Bieito comments. “There is no hope in young
people killing another young man – and it was based on a real incident. I was
completely surprised at the reaction.” But it’s worth remembering that other
critics responded to the production with words like “stunned admiration”, and I,
for one, found its raw and desperate humanity extraordinarily powerful.
British reactions to Bieito have generally been more
prurient than those in Germany, where modern, provocative productions are de rigeur. But if Britain’s tastes are
conservative, those of the US are even more so. Bieito is soon to work with New
York’s Metropolitan Opera, in another co-production with ENO, but the details
of what, when and how are closely guarded – possibly due to the likely degree
of resulting fuss.
Bieito was first drawn towards directing while a pupil in a
Jesuit school, where he says music and theatre were crucial parts of education.
He left drama college after one year, “because it was too posh for me”. Music has
been central to his life since childhood; his mother insisted on piano
practice, his father had a passion for Italian opera and his brother became a
professional musician. Despite his father’s influence, Italian bel canto is apparently
Bieito’s blind spot: “I enjoy watching it, but here I feel I have nothing to
say. I can’t direct an opera if I don’t love the music.”
Despite managerial belt-tightening in opera houses around
the world, Bieito is essentially optimistic about the future of the artform. “Opera
is an art of the future – it brings together so many elements – and I hope that
we will survive together, with some brave intendants,” he says. He recognises
that in difficult financial times decision-makers might become risk averse, but
feels this is not necessarily a sensible path: “I did my Carmen 13 years ago and now it is being taken up everywhere,” he points
out. “That means something is changing. Even if the intendants start to be more
conservative, it’s not possible to stop the new feelings of the people.
“It’s a completely wrong thing when people say ‘this opera
has to be done like this’ – usually
it only means that the costumes look a little bit old,” he adds. “You cannot
reproduce the atmosphere of the first opening of a Mozart or Verdi opera. They were
very modern in their time, very involved with people. Verdi was known in all of
society.” That is the kind of immediacy he is after.
His Fidelio could prove chewy. In Beethoven’s opera, the heroine Leonora’s husband, Florestan, is a political prisoner; she disguises herself as a man named Fidelio to infiltrate the prison and rescue him. Bieito’s staging, unlike his hyper-realistic Carmen and Don Giovanni, is complex and symbolic, set in a labyrinth that some reviewers of its Munich performances compared to The Matrix. “All the characters are lost in the labyrinth, imprisoned,” he says. “Sometimes our minds are our prison. I find Fidelio’s story quite weak if it is approached realistically, but if you take the philosophical side more seriously, then you can say much more about human beings today: what freedom means for us, or love, or loyalty, or justice. That is very important to our democracy.”
Above all, Beethoven’s idealistic humanism in Fidelio strikes a special chord with him.
“I think we need a new humanism in Europe in the very open, cultural sense, and
Fidelio gives me the opportunity to
talk about this,” he says. But his characters do not live happily ever after:
“It is very hard to believe in the possibility of justice,” he says –
melancholic again, thanks to his cynical view of politics in Spain.
“There are people
who’ll say ‘I don’t like Calixto Bieito, I don’t like anything he does’,” he comments.
“I don’t know how to convince them. You cannot go to an exhibition thinking
it’s going to be crap and you can’t go into a restaurant thinking ‘Oh, the food
will be terrible’. This I cannot change. But I’m talking about these topics:
justice, love, liberty, loyalty, freedom. We have to value these issues and we
have to protect our democracies very strongly from corruption. I think, when
it’s not just commercial, art is a way to freedom.”
Fidelio, English
National Opera, from 25 September. Box office: 020 7845 9300
Look who I'm off to see tomorrow
OK, it's not much to do with Schubert, the trip tomorrow. It's the Beethovenfest in Bonn and Andras will be playing a programme of sonatas including the D minor Op.31 No.2 and the 'Waldstein'. I haven't been to Bonn before and am a little excited at the prospect of seeing Beethoven's birthplace and also - unexpectedly, as I didn't know until yesterday that it existed - a Schumannhaus museum at the former asylum in Endenich (a suburb of Bonn), which is where our unlucky and much-loved Robert died in 1856. With Andras I'll be talking Beethoven, Bach, Bartok and big birthdays.
Meanwhile, enjoy his beautiful film about Schubert.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
A quick explanation of the Flattr button
You'll have noticed a new little green button at the top of the sidebar and beneath each JDCMB post. Flattr is a nice invention for us "content creators": it facilitates "microdonations", by which you can give a few cents or whatever as a sign of your appreciation of something you have read online. You set up an account, send it a small budget of your choice, and when you see something that seems to merit a few pennies, you can click on its Flattr button to donate some. Proceeds from Flattr on JDCMB all go towards JD's blogging expenses, including train tickets, gluten-free porridge and, of course, Solti's cat food. More about Flattr from its site here. And also more about how it works, here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)