Apparently the Times educational supplement has reported that only one in 10 Labour MPs think music should be included, and no (0) Tory MPs do at all. If it were to be excluded, it's anybody's guess as to how any gifted young musicians hoping to study music at any institution - here or abroad - would be able to support their aptitude with an academic qualification.
For today's SHOUT OUT! it's over to two wonderful British pianists: Leon McCawley and Margaret Fingerhut. And keep scrolling down to today's previous post to see Daniel Barenboim's words on how music can bring people together...
Catch up at the following links with SHOUT OUT 1 (Tasmin Little, Barry Douglas and Julian Lloyd Webber), SHOUT OUT 2 (James Rhodes, Errollyn Wallen and Nick van Bloss) and SHOUT OUT 3 (Paul Lewis, Nick Daniel and Eos Chater)
MARGARET FINGERHUT pianist
One school that I visit is facing huge hikes in the cost of music lessons from its local authority. It is set to rise astronomically, apparently by over £10 per hour. This will obviously put instrumental lessons beyond the reach of less well-off students. Furthermore parents will also have to commit their child to a full year’s tuition, so if young Fred takes up the oboe but decides he doesn’t like it after one term, the parents still have to pay for his lessons for the rest of the year. Evidently that’s likely to discourage kids from taking up a musical instrument in the first place.A propos what can be achieved if children are encouraged rather than dumbed-down to, I am reminded of the indefatigable and much-missed Maureen Lehane Wishart. She had an almost missionary zeal to enrich the lives of youngsters in her locality of Somerset. She once had 40 12-year-olds from all ethnic backgrounds from a deprived area in Bristol camping in her garden at Jackdaws for nine days while they worked at the choruses from Monteverdi’s Vespers. They then gave an hour long performance from memory - in Latin, if you please - at a local church, attended by their families and friends. Apparently everyone was in tears afterwards. Just imagine a world where this sort of thing could happen as a matter of course in our schools, for ALL children.
I don’t come from a musical background. However, my parents made a fortunate decision to buy a piano for me and my siblings to play on and had a small collection of classical music records in the house. In my childhood spent in a small village in Cheshire, my only real exposure to music was in my local primary school and having paid lessons with a local teacher. Fortunately, I had schoolteachers who understood the value of music. There were musical productions, carol concerts and peripatetic teachers coming into the school to introduce and teach a variety of instruments to the class. All these things were part and parcel of a school education. It is sad and incredulous to see that they are fast disappearing from the curriculum. Even though I eventually was able to go to a private specialist music school to pursue my dream of becoming a concert pianist, I owe a huge amount to my FREE primary school musical experience. We can’t expect everyone to be converted to the great joys and riches of classical music, but if there is no basic introduction offered at a young age, we can expect very bleak times ahead.
1 comment:
I have mixed feelings about the English Baccalaureate and the subjects included. It is not a new qualification, but a badge to denote that a student has gained good GCSE passes (A*-C) in five "core" subject areas (English, maths, a science, a foreign language and a humanities subject). Why these are considered the "core" is probably a debate for a different time and place.
Pragmatically my response is: students normally take more than five subjects anyway; what does a GCSE in a subject even mean in terms of competency (music is meant to be grade 5 equivalent) and understanding; not taking a subject at GCSE is no indication of lack of interest/talent.
But for schools the message they seem to have grasped is "non Bac. subjects have no value". Schools have started to deny children the opportunity to take subjects that won't count towards the Bac. (not only music, art and drama, but design and technology and RE too). The proportion of students getting the Bac. will be used for league tables and hence schools will focus on getting success in subjects that count. The government's white paper on education talks about students having a broad range of experiences and subjects, and a access to culture - what is happening seemingly runs contrary to their aims, and they should be worried.
I think the Bac. should widen "humanities" to "humanities, arts or technology", which caters then for a broader set of skills and interests.
Currently music is a compulsory part of the KS 1-3 curriculum, with it being optional at KS4. If schools remove the KS4 (GCSE)option, it does not take a genius to work out that schools will reduce the number of music teachers and the provision within the school as a whole will deteriorate.
Education in arts subjects (not just music) is not just about supporting the emerging generation of professionals, but about giving people the chance to find a place for the arts in their lives, and seeing that value, whether as an audience, or as a taste-maker of the future. Therefore, the effect on the arts more broadly will be detrimental (in the long term) if the current trends continue.
Post a Comment